It depends what you want to know. Tools like Hubstaff, Time Doctor and ActivTrak measure time logged, activity levels, which apps and sites were open, and often screenshots. If your question is "was this person at the keyboard?", any of them answers it. If your question is "was the work right?", none of them do. For a recruiting desk, the thing that matters, whether the right candidate went to the right order, is not on any monitoring dashboard. That needs a different kind of tool.
What monitoring software measures
- Time. Logged in, idle, active. Often turned into a daily total.
- Activity. Mouse and keyboard events per minute, shown as a percentage.
- Apps and websites. Which were open and for how long, sorted into "productive" and not.
- Screenshots. At intervals, sometimes blurred, sometimes not.
- Keystrokes and messages. On some tools, on company systems.
All of it answers one question: was this person active on this device? The tools differ in price, in how much they show the employee, and in whether screenshots can be turned off. Those are the things to compare if you buy one.
What none of it measures
Whether the submittal sent at 2 p.m. answered the job order. Whether the confirmation for Monday listed the gate and the card. Whether the client will reorder. A recruiter can have a 97 percent activity score and three rejected submittals. Another can have 55 percent and a placement that stuck. The dashboard ranks them backwards.
On a recruiting desk, the job is judgment and follow-through. Monitoring measures neither.
If you must choose one
- Tell people, in writing. Some states require it. Everywhere, it is the difference between monitoring and spying.
- Turn off screenshots and keystrokes. Activity and app data are enough for the "was anyone there" question. The rest costs trust and buys nothing.
- Show people their own data. Fair tools do.
- Never use it to rank recruiters. Rank on first submittals accepted and placements that stick.
The other kind of software
Work review software asks the other question. It holds the brief, the job order, and reads the finished work, the submittal, against it, then says what matches and what is missing. It cannot tell you whether a laptop was open at 3 p.m. It can tell you whether the work was right before the client saw it, which is the thing the client is paying for.
Most firms that buy monitoring software wanted the second thing and bought the first because it was familiar.
Where M-Tracker fits
M-Tracker is the second kind. No screenshots, no keystroke logging, no activity scores. Each submittal and confirmation is read against the written order before the manager or client sees it, with a plain-words note on what is missing. The owner knows the work is right without watching anyone, and the recruiter's screen stays their own.
Try M-Tracker free14-day trial. No credit card. No employee surveillance.
Questions people ask
Is monitoring software worth it for a remote team?
For "is anyone there," it works. For "is the work good," it does not. Most remote-team problems are the second kind.
Will recruiters quit over monitoring?
The good ones often do, or they learn to keep the light green. Either way, placements do not improve.
What is the cheapest option?
Three outcome numbers per recruiter, weekly, from the work itself. First submittals accepted, placements that stick, candidates who heard back. Costs nothing.
Work you can trust, without redoing it.
Your team gets feedback before work reaches you, or your client.
Copyright © 2020 – 2026 M-Tracker. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy